Si Li Wei sued Huiding Technology to compensate 80.5 million yuan, which was rejected because the patent was invalid!

From2018Since the beginning of the year, there have been many patent infringement disputes between Shenzhen Huiding Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Huiding Technology") and Shanghai Sili Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Sili Micro"). The number of times and the high amount of compensation have aroused widespread concern in the industry.2018Year9Month12On the same day, huidingtech sued siliwei and Shenzhen dingxin unlimited technology co., ltd, claiming that the two defendants infringed on their fingerprint chips.3patents, claims for each patent7000Ten thousand yuan.2018Year11Month6On the same day, Huiding Technology sued Sili Micro, Xinli Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Suning Tesco Sales Co., Ltd. for infringement of their new patents, demanding that the three defendants be ordered to compensate for economic losses.5000Ten thousand yuan.11Month20On the same day, Huiding Technology added to the above three defendants again.2Utility model patent infringement litigation, each patent claims economic losses.5000Ten thousand yuan.2018Year12In January, Sili Wei began to fight back against Huideng Technology, suing Huideng Technology and Shanghai Glamour Family Digital Technology Co., Ltd. for infringing on it.3The court is required to order the defendant to compensate for economic losses.2.4billion yuan. Patent infringement lawsuits between the parties up4times, the total amount of compensation claimed is up6Billions of dollars, in addition to high reasonable expenses.

In response to the patent lawsuit filed by Silico, Huiding Technology in2019Year2Month12Japan filed an invalid request for one of the patents involved.2019Year8Month8The patent involved in the case was declared invalid.10Month16On the same day, the accepting court rejected Silico's lawsuit.10Month23On the same day, Huiding Technology issued an announcement on the latest progress of the case, saying that the court's relevant rejection ruling will not have a negative impact on the company's current and future profits.

In patent infringement litigation, it is a common countermeasure for the defendant to initiate the invalidation procedure for the patent involved. The people's court will decide whether to suspend the trial of the patent infringement case according to different circumstances. Generally speaking, the court accepts the infringement of utility model and design patent rights. If the defendant requests to declare the patent right invalid during the defense period, the people's court shall suspend the lawsuit. During the trial, according to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Disputes(2)According to the first paragraph of Article 2, if the claim claimed by the right holder in the patent infringement lawsuit is declared invalid by the Patent Reexamination Board, the people's court hearing the patent infringement dispute case may rule to reject the right holder's lawsuit based on the invalid claim. In this case, the Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office review and invalidation trial department made the first41364No. invalidation request review decision, the declaration of the patent patent rights involved, this decision turned the entire case to the absolute advantage of Huiding Technology, Si Li Wei's claims were all rejected, including.8000$10,000 in financial compensation and50Reasonable expenses of $10,000.