Tongling Technology withdrew the 1 billion patent infringement lawsuit, and Bull Group entered the list of the meeting.

This year3Month4Jiangsu Tongling Technology Co., Ltd.(Abbreviations“Tongling Technology”)v.Bull Group Co., Ltd. (referred to“Bull Group”)The patent infringement dispute was heard in the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court, and the plaintiff's claim for compensation was as high as nearly10Billion yuan, its high compensation request has aroused widespread concern, the outside world generally believes that it may give.Bull GroupThe listing process has a certain impact.Just in11Month21day,there are six enterprises at the meeting,The Bull Group appears on the list. According to the relevant personnel of the Bull Group, the plaintiff Tongling Technology's lawsuit against the Bull Group for patent infringement has been withdrawn or rejected, which may mean that the Bull GroupIPOThe road will not be affected by the patent litigation of Tongling Technology.

Bull Group prospectus disclosure,2018Year12In January, Tongling Technology filed a lawsuit with Nanjing Intermediate People's Court with Nanjing Central Jincheng Warehouse Supermarket Co., Ltd. (defendant 1) and Bull Group (defendant 2) as co-defendants. The lawsuit involves two patents, one is the invention patent support sliding safety door (patent number.ZL201010297882.4) And utility model patent power socket safety protection device (patent number isZL201020681902.3). Two patents are involved.10patent litigation cases, each of which is the subject9990Ten thousand yuan.2019Year7Month23On the 15th, Bull Group said that it had received the "Review Decision on Request for Invalidation" issued by the Review and Invalidation Department of the Patent Office of the State Intellectual Property Office (No.40759No.40829No.), it is determined that all the claims of the two patents involved in the case of Tongling Technology do not have creativity as stipulated in the third paragraph of Article 22 of the the People's Republic of China Patent Law, and the two patents are declared invalid.The referee's document network announced the Nanjing Intermediate Court related.5The first instance civil ruling of the case. The date of deposit is7Month5On the same day, the civil ruling showed that Tongling Technology was in.2019Year7Month3Day to be involved in the case No.ZL201010297882.4The patent right for the invention of "supporting sliding safety door" has been declared invalid by the State Intellectual Property Office, and the lawsuit against Bull Group has been withdrawn.

on the other hand,Tongling Technology was quite surprised by the invalidation of the patent, arguing thatSerious violation of the legal principles of fairness and impartiality, suspected of internal and external collusion, black box operation.in its official website,Intellectual Property Inquiry Network in (2019year)7Month3Day morning11The State Intellectual Property Office issued the No.40759,40829The announcement of the decision to review the request for invalidation, in.11About the same time.IPRdailyAccording to the website, Chen Hao and Gao Chao, lawyers representing the case, were invited to make a brief analysis of the case, and unexpectedly released a long article on the interview with a large amount of information, completing an impossible miracle. The only explanation is that the contents of the decision have been known in advance and it is a well-prepared press release. Facts have proved that the collegial panel of the case has created a wrong case by means of internal and external collusion, and has already informed the Bull Group, the claimant for invalidation, of the result of the decision.

Tong Ling Technology said,“The two decisions downloaded from the Internet by the patentee were found to be erroneous in fact, arbitrarily expanding the interpretation of the claim, and making unfounded judgments.”. and said“Resolutely continue to appeal and carry out the rights protection to the end.”