NEWS

Vantage four violations of the United States dishwasher patent

Release time:

2022-08-10 11:11

Recently,Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court (hereinafter referred to"Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court") made a new first-instance judgment on the dishwasher patent infringement case of Foshan Shunde Midea Washing Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Midea") v. Huadi Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Huadi") (2021) Zhe01Knowing the Beginning of the People544No., ordered Huadi to immediately stop manufacturing, selling and promising to sell the patent number enjoyed by the United States.ZL201420326162.X“Dishwasher”Products within the scope of patent protection, destroy the inventory of infringing products, and compensate the United States for the total.310Ten thousand yuan.

According to previous reports, as early2018Year11In January, the United States once violated Huadi.its“ZL201420653275.0”Dishwasher patent rights case filed a lawsuit, the first instance of the court in the case, the second instance ruled that Huadi constituted infringement, and compensation for the United States.60Ten thousand yuan. Then in2020Year8In January, the United States violated Huadi again.ZL201320169306.0Dishwasher patent case filed a lawsuit, the Supreme People's Court final judgment: Huadi immediately stop production, sales, promised sales infringe on the United StatesPatent Number:“ZL201320169306.0", patent name:"Dishwasher overflow prevention structure and dishwasher”Patent rights for dishwasher products and compensation for beauty60Ten thousand yuan.Secondly, on the same patent (ZL201320169306.0), not long ago, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court made another first-instance judgment in the case of Midea v. Huadi dishwasher patent infringement, and ordered Huadi to immediately stop manufacturing, selling, and promising to sell what fell into Midea's enjoyment.Products within the scope of patent protection, destroy the inventory of infringing products, and compensate the United States.100Ten thousand yuan.

It can be seen from the case of Vantage's repeated violations of Midea's dishwasher.In the new era when intellectual property protection has become an important guarantee for innovation and development, the core competitiveness of products ultimately depends on the continuous innovation and accumulation of technology.otherwise in intellectual propertyUnder the trend of "strong" protection, it will pay a heavy price.. At the same time, in the face of malicious infringement by competitors, we also need to learn how to use intellectual property laws to protect our legitimate rights and interests.

 

Infringement, beauty, dishwasher, infringement, sale, product, patent, patent, million, protection