Ningde won another patent dispute in the era, with the claim amount reaching 0.64 billion yuan.

2023Year2Month21Date, for Zhongchuang Xirong (3931) and a lawsuit-related patent in the Ningde era.The first instance judgment of the intellectual property infringement dispute case of "lithium-ion battery" was released. The case was heard by the Fuzhou Intermediate Court, Zhongchuang Xinhang in.2023Year2Month20The Civil Judgment made by Fuzhou Intermediate People's Court was received on the 2nd. The main contents are as follows:

1Zhongchuang Xinhang Technology Group Co., Ltd. shall immediately stop selling the invention patent right of Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. from the effective date of this judgment.(Application No.CN110010851B, The invention name is lithium ion battery)of the product;

2Zhongchuang Xinhang Technology Group Co., Ltd. shall compensate Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. for economic losses within 15 days from the effective date of this judgment.3580Ten thousand yuan, to pay the cost of the temporary protection period of the invention patent.79.8Ten thousand yuan;

3Zhongchuang Xinhang Technology Group Co., Ltd. shall pay reasonable expenses of RMB to Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. within 15 days from the effective date of this judgment.20.27Ten thousand yuan;

42. Reject other claims of Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

Case acceptance fee RMB43.18RMB million, to be borne by Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co.20.6Ten thousand yuan, Zhongchuang Xinhang Technology Group Co., Ltd. to bear the burden of RMB.22.58Ten thousand yuan.If you are not satisfied with this judgment, you may, within 15 days from the date of service of the judgment, submit a petition of appeal to the Fuzhou Intermediate People's Court, and file a copy of the number of the other party or the number of representatives, and appeal to the Supreme People's Court.

This judgment is a first-instance judgment, not a final judgment,Zhongchuang Singapore AirlinesHe said that he would appeal the first instance judgment to the Supreme Court during the appeal period, and it was not possible to determine the time and result of the final judgment. At the same time, the validity of the patent is still in the trial of the State Intellectual Property Office.

The patent dispute between the Ningde era and Zhongchuang Xinhang has been going on for a long time,2021Year7In January, Ningde Times sued Zhongchuang Singapore Airlines, demanding that Zhongchuang Singapore Airlines stop manufacturing and selling infringing products and claim compensation.1.88billion yuan,2022Year5MonthNingde era will claimFurther increase5.18Billions of dollars;2022Year8In January, Ningde Times filed another lawsuit, adding unfair competition and the amount of the claim.1.3Billions of dollarsSo far,Ningde era.For Zhongxin AirlinesThe total claim amount6.4Billions of dollars.Total Involving5the patents,including two patents for invention:CN110010903B-Positive pole piece and battery;CN111969166B-Current collecting member and battery;Utility model three pieces:CN204668368UPower battery top cover structure and power battery;CN205231128U-Explosion-proof device;CN110010903B-Positive pole piece and battery.

2022Year7Month, for Ningde era5A lawsuit patent, Zhongchuang Xinhang.filed the above applicationPatent invalid claims, three of which Zhongxin Airlines has voluntarily withdrawn.SubsequentlyThe State Intellectual Property Office intervened in the examination and ruled that among the remaining two patents, the Ningde era'sUtility ModelPatent“CN205231128U-Explosion-proof device”Maintain all effective,InventionPatent“CN111969166B-Current collecting member and battery”Maintain partial validity.

In addition to the patent dispute with Zhongchuang Xinhang, Ningde Times has also initiated patent infringement lawsuits against other peers.2021Year3In January, Ningde Times sued Tafel New Energy Technology Co.And Wanguo (Fuzhou) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. infringes on the utility model.“CN205231128U-Explosion-proof device"Patent Rights,Fujian Higher People's CourtAfter the trial, the result of the judgment in this case is:

1. Jiangsu Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Dongguan Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. shall immediately stop manufacturing and selling the utility model patent right of Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (patent number:ZL201521112402.7) of battery products (single model isLAE895－100Ah,FFH3D3－120AhandFFH3D3－135Ah）；

2. Wanguo (Fuzhou) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd. shall immediately stop selling and assembling the utility model patent of Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (patent number:ZL201521112402.7) of battery products (single model isLAE895－100Ah) of electric vehicles;

3. Jiangsu Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Dongguan Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. shall jointly compensate Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. for economic losses within 15 days from the effective date of this judgment.22,979,287yuan;

4. Jiangsu Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Dongguan Tafel New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. shall, within 15 days from the effective date of this judgment, jointly and severally compensate Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. for the reasonable expenses incurred to stop the infringement.326,769yuan;

The 5. rejected other claims of Ningde Times New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

The success of the above-mentioned patent litigation once again proves that patents, as an intangible asset, have great commercial value and are an important means to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises. For enterprises, patents can be used as a shield to protect their own technology and products; it can also be used as a spear to combat the infringement of opponents. Therefore, it is necessary for enterprises to have a long-term vision and carry out long-term patent planning in the early stage of entrepreneurship. The role of reasonable layout of patents to enterprises is inestimable.