Open in advance cannot be checked blindly.
Release time:
2023-04-28 13:31
After the patent is generally submitted.18 months open, go to substantive review, final authorization.
Why does it have to beThe number "18" is said to be a strict argument. According to the author's conjecture, it is homophonic "to send!"
If it does not meet the conditions of Nanjing Protection Center and priority review, it needs to go through3-4 years.
In the last centuryBefore the 1960 s, patent specifications were published after authorization.
In line with the logic of knowing the production of small white, this is the real"Protection".
Then let's follow this logic and apply only today's application volume.
You will find:
There is definitely a backlog of cases for the application department.
It is not protected for the applicant to wait for a period of several years until there is no result.
There must be duplication of research for the public.
In 1964, the Netherlands established the "early disclosure, delayed review" system, and later all countries have used the system.
Under this rule, the need for humanization is rehearsed:
1. Acceleration of time. You can choose to make it public in advance, usually 6 to 10 months from the date of application. If the product is about to go on the market, it needs to be protected as soon as possible, and the urgent public is to speed up the authorization.
2. Temporary protection, sufficient consideration time and active choice. After the disclosure, the applicant will have the opportunity to apply for temporary protection. Delaying the disclosure will have enough time to modify the technical scheme to avoid imitation by competitors and can be withdrawn at any time to avoid losses.
3. Reduce the workload of approval. Public supervision, everyone can query the public opinion.
What would apply to early disclosure?
- Some improved invention or updated block technology. Because the patent examination cycle is longer, to prevent the depreciation of the commercial value of the patent, early public access to the examination process.
- The applied technology faces the risk of passive disclosure.
- Reduce the probability of competitors obtaining authorization for relevant patents and avoid competitors from forming patent advantages to seize the market.
Therefore, the advance disclosure of patents cannot be blindly checked, and needs to be considered in combination with the actual situation of the enterprise.